The SDEA Board Voted Last Night to Open Our Contract

A few hours ago, thirteen members of the SDEA Board emailed the entire SDEA membership informing us that they have voted to “bargain over limited issues” with the District “in an effort to stop layoffs.”

Let us all be absolutely clear about what this means: The SDEA Board has voted to open our contract and bargain concessionsno matter what other words they may use to describe the process. The SDEA Board made this decision without first obtaining the approval of the SDEA membership. This is despite repeated assurances from SDEA President Bill Freeman all year that he would not open the contract and make concessions unless the membership decided to do so. Instead, tonight a dozen people decided to bargain away the hard-fought pay of thousands — without even waiting to see what the June 30 final state budget will contain, andwithout any guarantee that these negotiations will bring back all or even most of the laid off educators from this year or last year.

Our union leadership lied to us. They opened our contract without our approval. But we can close it.

The SDEA Board cannot finalize this deal without a ratification approval vote of the entire membership. We have some real work to do — the work our union should have been doing since March — to keep our contract from being gutted and our fellow educators from being hung out to dry.

Next steps:

1.     Sign up — Make sure you and every member you know is signed up for the Breakfast Club mailing list so we can stay in touch in the summer months as events unfold.

2.     Show up — Make sure your school has a delegate in attendance at the very first union-wide Breakfast Club meeting — Monday, June 11 at 4 p.m. We need all hands on deck if we are going to turn things around in our union. Email to let us know who is coming from your school, and we will send you the location.

This is the beginning, not the end.

In solidarity,

The Breakfast Club Action Group

____________________________________

For those of you catching up, here is a synopsis of what has happened in the last three days:

Tuesday — The SDEA Board voted in open session to bargain concessions only if 70% of SDEA members were polled and agreed to bargaining concessions. The Board agreed to meet after Wednesday’s Rep. Council to appoint a bargaining team.

Wednesday — The SDEA Rep. Council (the monthly union meeting where every school has a representative) expressed widespread anger about the flaws of the phone survey, and demanded a better system for collecting members’ input. Late in the meeting a motion was made to halt the survey entirely and replace it with an improved process; the motion failed 46-45. SDEA President made no mention to the Rep. Council about the Board’s vote the previous night to approve bargaining concessions. After Rep. Council, SDEA President Bill Freeman canceled the Board’s scheduled meeting to appoint a bargaining team.

Thursday — The SDEA Board held another emergency Board meeting and conducted all of the business of the meeting in closed session. In the past, bargaining discussions have taken place in closed session, but the votes themselves have always been conducted in open session. Tonight the Board conducted their voting in closed session despite more than 30 SDEA members who showed up at the meeting to observe. During open session, Bill Freeman stated that the all-member phone survey is now being “set aside.” That conflicts with Tuesday’s Board vote, Wednesday’s Rep. Council vote, and all of the information provided to SDEA members to date. After the meeting, the SDEA Board emailed the membership stating that they had authorized bargaining concessions with the District, despite the lack of completion of the member survey and despite any assurance that these concessions will result in all or even most of our laid off members returning.

Friday — The next steps are ours to take!

2 thoughts on “The SDEA Board Voted Last Night to Open Our Contract

  1. Take note teachers. On one hand, Southwest College made concessions on the promise they wouid save jobs. Days later, the school sent the layoff notices. Concessions do not save jobs. Look at 40 year of auto-worker retreats. Now, the UAW, having made concession on concession, is 1/3 its size. They promised to “save the American auto industry,” while the auto bosses out-sourced their jobs. A counter example–Chicago’s teacher union just took a strike vote. Early reports show 90% support. San Francisco has done the same. While the national NEA and AFT won’t support them as the union bosses are on their knees to Obama, those locals, like San Diego, are big enough to fight back on their own. If a caucus were to grow that included leaders from those locals, something might emerge–something powerful.

  2. Pingback: NEW: Association for Union Democracy Publishes The Breakfast Club’s Story! « The Breakfast Club Action Group

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s